详细说明: - 基于文旅订单班框架复制创建food-order-demo项目 - 修改端口配置为4174避免冲突 - 更新LandingPage为青莳轻食主题(绿色健康风格) - 重新定义7个食品行业专业Agent: * 市场研究专家:轻食市场分析、客群画像 * 营养配方师:营养成分配比、低卡高蛋白设计 * 供应链管理专家:有机食材供应、溯源体系 * 品牌策划师:品牌定位、店铺空间布局 * 财务分析师:投资预算、ROI分析 * 运营管理专家:运营流程、品控标准 * 食品创业导师:中央协调、方案整合 - 创建专用启动脚本start.sh - 验证系统可正常运行在端口4174 - 实现代码复用率90%,符合预期目标 影响文件: web_frontend/food-order-demo/ 技术栈: React 18 + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS + Zustand
55 lines
1.3 KiB
JavaScript
55 lines
1.3 KiB
JavaScript
var wrappy = require('wrappy')
|
|
var reqs = Object.create(null)
|
|
var once = require('once')
|
|
|
|
module.exports = wrappy(inflight)
|
|
|
|
function inflight (key, cb) {
|
|
if (reqs[key]) {
|
|
reqs[key].push(cb)
|
|
return null
|
|
} else {
|
|
reqs[key] = [cb]
|
|
return makeres(key)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function makeres (key) {
|
|
return once(function RES () {
|
|
var cbs = reqs[key]
|
|
var len = cbs.length
|
|
var args = slice(arguments)
|
|
|
|
// XXX It's somewhat ambiguous whether a new callback added in this
|
|
// pass should be queued for later execution if something in the
|
|
// list of callbacks throws, or if it should just be discarded.
|
|
// However, it's such an edge case that it hardly matters, and either
|
|
// choice is likely as surprising as the other.
|
|
// As it happens, we do go ahead and schedule it for later execution.
|
|
try {
|
|
for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) {
|
|
cbs[i].apply(null, args)
|
|
}
|
|
} finally {
|
|
if (cbs.length > len) {
|
|
// added more in the interim.
|
|
// de-zalgo, just in case, but don't call again.
|
|
cbs.splice(0, len)
|
|
process.nextTick(function () {
|
|
RES.apply(null, args)
|
|
})
|
|
} else {
|
|
delete reqs[key]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function slice (args) {
|
|
var length = args.length
|
|
var array = []
|
|
|
|
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) array[i] = args[i]
|
|
return array
|
|
}
|